Mercury Global blog posts

The UK just rewrote the rules on payments. Stablecoins are no longer the future they’re the framework.

2026 - A Best Guess

What, How and Why? Multicurrency Virtual Accounts Explained

Time for a New Economic Model

The Revolution Will Not Be Centralised

The Machine Is Broken

Mercury-Ripple-VALR Pushing Technological Boundaries

February, not all roses and romance for the South African economy

Buckle up for 2021, it’s going to be busy!

Mercury launches 11 new currencies

Trump, Biden and Brexit: How they will affect markets and your pocket

Investing in an infected world

Mercury joins the Open Payments Coalition

Zimbabwe Crisis: Rand likely to see its volatility continue.

Australian House Prices – Gone in 60 Minutes?

Rand uncertainty as the turmoil in Turkey continues

Long Term Pain Ahead for the Rand

Rand in for a bumpy ride.

Where is sterling headed?

Checking in on Global Markets

A month of ups & downs – a look at April’s currency action

Vive le Macron?

Everything you need to know about Article 50

How low can the rand go?

Chancellor Hammond's Taxing Budget

Donald's Dollar

The SARB was expected to cut fifty basis points this year. It is now debating a hike. The rand's resilience has a reason.

Sterling advanced through Monday's London session and extended to 1.3584 in overnight trading, a genuine gain that carries more information than the number alone suggests. The currency has absorbed the full weight of a deteriorating Iran ceasefire, Brent crude above $100 for the second consecutive week, and a global risk environment that should, on conventional assumptions, be compressing higher-beta currencies. Instead, sterling is outperforming. The reason is that the Bank of England's domestic rate narrative has become the dominant driver, and the rate case has strengthened materially over the past week.

The UK swaps curve is now signalling close to 50 basis points of Bank of England rate increases over the next twelve months, a repricing that has accelerated since the April MPC meeting produced an 8-1 vote with chief economist Huw Pill dissenting in favour of an immediate 25 basis point increase. BNP Paribas is now explicitly calling for two hikes in 2026, with June as the first possible date. That is the analyst consensus moving, not merely options market speculation, and when the analyst community and the swaps curve are moving in the same direction at the same speed, the signal tends to be durable.

The 18 June MPC decision is the event that will validate or deflate the repricing. What arrives before it matters more: the May CPI print will capture the early impact of higher energy costs feeding through to domestic fuel and utility prices, and the April MPC minutes, due later this month, will be read closely for any indication that other members moved toward dissent short of a formal vote. An 8-1 split is a signal; a 6-3 or 7-2 outcome in June is a pivot. The distinction will not be clear until the vote itself.

The ceiling for sterling is the June decision's outcome; the floor is global risk appetite. A further deterioration in the Iran situation that tips equity markets into a genuine risk-off configuration would pressure sterling as a risk-correlated currency even as the domestic rate case strengthens. That tension, between a rate narrative pointing upward and a geopolitical environment pointing toward caution, is what makes sterling's path non-linear between now and 18 June. The repricing has moved fast; positions sized for a gradual appreciation may find the remaining move arrives in a single session.

The Dollar Index sits at 97.92 this morning, a modest but meaningful softening from Monday's 98.15. The detail that makes this number significant is its context: the dollar is not strengthening on a day when President Trump described Iran's latest ceasefire proposal as "garbage" and senior administration figures raised the possibility of resuming major combat operations. Geopolitical escalation of that order would, in a prior cycle, have pushed the DXY toward 99 or above. The fact that it has not done so suggests the haven bid is being offset by a separate and growing uncertainty: what Kevin Warsh's arrival at the Federal Reserve on 15 May means for the dollar's interest rate support.

The Senate confirmed Warsh's nomination in a 49-44 vote on Monday, with a small number of Democratic crossovers. He takes the chair on Thursday, when Jerome Powell's term expires. The institutional transition is the most significant in eight years and arrives at a moment when the policy task has become measurably harder. Warsh's documented record suggests a higher tolerance for inflation persistence than the current Fed consensus, a posture that was within a reasonable range of debate when Brent was at $97. 

At $104.97, and with a 2027 oil normalisation timeline now on the table, the market is questioning whether that tolerance implies a Fed that is slower to respond to a supply-side shock than the situation will allow. Rate probability markets continue to price no change to the federal funds rate through the end of 2026. That consensus is showing early signs of stress: futures pricing has nudged in the direction of a hike by year-end, without yet pricing one with conviction. The inflection point will likely be Warsh's first public communication on policy posture, which may arrive before the June FOMC meeting. 

That statement, whenever it comes, will move markets faster than the scheduled calendar implies. The current configuration presents an unusual picture: a dollar that is not behaving as a safe haven at precisely the moment geopolitical risk is at its highest in weeks. Whether that reflects a temporary dislocation or a genuine shift in how the market perceives dollar risk will be answered faster than the formal Fed calendar allows. Forward commitments denominated in dollars, made in the assumption of continued haven premium, may need to account for the possibility that the premium has begun to erode.

The rand closed Monday's JSE session at 16.45 per dollar, a modest deterioration from Friday's close of 16.39, but one that understates the degree to which the domestic narrative has stabilised a currency that was trading above 16.84 as recently as last week. The JSE All Share Index gained 0.3% on Monday to approximately 121,150, its third consecutive session of gains, a sequence that signals improved domestic risk perception at a moment when the external environment has not improved. What has changed is the SARB rate story, and the change is considerable.

South Africa's central bank entered 2026 with consensus forecasts pointing firmly toward 50 basis points of interest rate reductions across the year. That expectation has reversed completely. The bank is now facing live market debate about a 25 basis point increase at the 28 May meeting, driven by the fuel price channel. The May 6 retail fuel adjustment has begun feeding into the consumer price index, with analysts projecting headline CPI at 4.2% for the second quarter: a level that places inflation close to the upper end of the SARB's 3-6% tolerance band and that Governor Kganyago's data-dependent language can no longer comfortably accommodate.

The growth constraint makes the decision genuinely difficult. South Africa's 2026 GDP forecast of 1.4% leaves limited margin for the demand destruction a rate increase would introduce. A hike at 28 May would lift the prime rate to 11.50% and signal that the SARB prioritises its inflation mandate over near-term growth protection. That is a credible position; it is also a costly one if external oil pressure recedes before the second-round inflation effects the bank is pre-empting actually materialise. The case for holding is not absent; it has simply become harder to articulate publicly.

The rand's relative stability this week reflects improved domestic risk perception rather than any reduction in external pressure, and both can unwind faster than positions built on linear movement allow. Repatriation timing and import cost decisions premised on the current rate holding through the end of May are being made into a 28 May event that now carries genuine two-way uncertainty. Each Iran escalation, each weekly oil figure, and each public statement from Pretoria carries asymmetric weight in a currency that is, for now, holding at levels that require active explanation.

The 2027 oil normalisation timeline now has its first institutional author. Saudi Aramco quantified the Hormuz supply deficit at 100 million barrels for every week the strait remains closed, with a cumulative loss of approximately 880 million barrels across ten weeks of disruption, and indicated that markets may not recover to pre-disruption supply levels before 2027 unless Hormuz reopens by mid-June. Brent is trading at $104.97 this morning, up incrementally from Monday's close. That relative stability, despite the scale of that assessment, suggests the near-term oil repricing may have already occurred; what has not repriced is the forward inflation trajectory embedded in central bank models across G10 economies.

President Trump's characterisation of Iran's latest proposal as "garbage" on Monday, intensifying Sunday's "totally unacceptable" language, has been accompanied by reporting that senior administration figures are now more seriously evaluating a return to major combat operations. Strait of Hormuz transit currently stands at two to five vessels per day, compared with approximately 70 before the conflict began. Saudi Aramco has activated its East-West pipeline at near-maximum capacity, redirecting up to seven million barrels per day to Red Sea export terminals, a meaningful but structurally insufficient mitigation. The 100 million barrel weekly deficit cannot be routed around a pipeline system designed for a different supply geography.

Equity markets are processing the Aramco statement without the dislocation that oil at $105 might have been expected to produce. The S&P 500 closed at 7,397 on Friday, broadly flat from the record set the previous week. Q1 earnings are providing the stabilising force: 84% of reporting companies exceeded analyst EPS estimates, giving the index a corporate momentum buffer against the macro headwinds. Energy sector outperformance is contributing to index resilience, which creates an unusual dynamic where the index is partially insulated from the oil shock it is simultaneously exposed to. That insulation has a limit; if Brent extends materially above current levels and is sustained there, margin compression in energy-intensive consumer sectors will begin to outweigh the earnings tailwind from energy names.

The Aramco 2027 timeline is a supply-side projection, not yet a market consensus, but its public articulation forces a modelling update that has been deferred. Risk managers treating a 2026 Hormuz resolution as the base case will need to run a 2027 scenario; central bank economists will face questions about how much of the current inflation trajectory reflects a transient disruption and how much requires a policy response. The volatility that those modelling updates generate will appear in options pricing across GBP, USD, and ZAR before it arrives in spot rates, and the distance between current hedging costs and where they may be priced by month-end is a gap with a deadline.

Currency markets never sleep, and news moves fast.

Global economic commentary

Tuesday, 12 May 2026 ∙ 8 min

Daily Brief

Continue reading